NFL Export Rankings
Alright, I suggested it to Sto, but I couldn't wait to see the results. Here is the ranking of states based on their NFL player to total population ratio. NFL player totals were taken off of the site that Storo linked to, and populations were based off of approximate July 2005 populations for each state. Populations were taken in millions rounded to three decimal places, which is probably too accurate. Hope I got all of the state abbreviations correct. Anyway, we can take three things from this analysis:
1. Nebraska is king over the West and Midwest.
2. SEC football should be better than it is.
3. Don't recruit in New England.
Props to Hawaii and their abundance of linemen. Also a suprise is D.C. with double the score of any other East Coast state. All in all not what I expected, but Nebraska didn't do too bad with a 9th place finish. South Dakota verified that it will be a powerhouse no time in the near future coming in at 39th. The numbers do not lie gentlemen. Feel free to analyze.
Current NFL players per million citizens:
I'm not going to go as far as to say I agree with Mr. Hornung, but with no comment on intellectual ability, only the obvious advantage in athletic ability, I would say that these numbers are interesting when compared to this Link.
Go Big Red
1. Nebraska is king over the West and Midwest.
2. SEC football should be better than it is.
3. Don't recruit in New England.
Props to Hawaii and their abundance of linemen. Also a suprise is D.C. with double the score of any other East Coast state. All in all not what I expected, but Nebraska didn't do too bad with a 9th place finish. South Dakota verified that it will be a powerhouse no time in the near future coming in at 39th. The numbers do not lie gentlemen. Feel free to analyze.
Current NFL players per million citizens:
| Rank | State | NFL/Pop |
| 1 | LA | 16.80 |
| 2 | MS | 15.75 |
| 3 | DC | 14.55 |
| 4 | SC | 11.28 |
| 5 | FL | 10.06 |
| 6 | GA | 9.92 |
| 7 | AL | 9.65 |
| 8 | HI | 9.41 |
| 9 | NE | 7.96 |
| 10 | IA | 7.75 |
| 11 | TX | 7.70 |
| 12 | AR | 7.56 |
| 13 | OH | 6.80 |
| 14 | OK | 6.48 |
| 15 | VA | 6.48 |
| 16 | WA | 6.36 |
| 17 | TN | 5.53 |
| 18 | CA | 5.51 |
| 19 | NC | 5.18 |
| 20 | NJ | 5.16 |
| 21 | MD | 5.00 |
| 22 | MI | 4.94 |
| 23 | ID | 4.90 |
| 24 | KS | 4.74 |
| 25 | PA | 4.67 |
| 26 | UT | 4.45 |
| 27 | OR | 4.12 |
| 28 | MO | 3.97 |
| 29 | WY | 3.93 |
| 30 | AZ | 3.87 |
| 31 | CO | 3.64 |
| 32 | DE | 3.56 |
| 33 | IL | 3.53 |
| 34 | ND | 3.14 |
| 35 | WI | 3.07 |
| 36 | NV | 2.90 |
| 37 | KY | 2.88 |
| 38 | MA | 2.81 |
| 39 | SD | 2.58 |
| 40 | MN | 2.53 |
| 41 | IN | 2.23 |
| 42 | WV | 2.20 |
| 43 | MT | 2.14 |
| 44 | CT | 1.71 |
| 45 | NY | 1.61 |
| 46 | AK | 1.51 |
| 47 | NM | 1.04 |
| t48 | ME | 0.00 |
| t48 | RI | 0.00 |
| t48 | VT | 0.00 |
| t48 | NH | 0.00 |
I'm not going to go as far as to say I agree with Mr. Hornung, but with no comment on intellectual ability, only the obvious advantage in athletic ability, I would say that these numbers are interesting when compared to this
Go Big Red
2 Comments:
This is pretty impressive for Nebraska. But the naysayer in me is guessing that Nebraska may slowly drop on this list as the recruiting emphasis at NU shifts slightly away from in-state athletes. Some of in-state guys that NU used to have will probably start going to smaller programs with lesser coaching, development and exposure which will probably reduce their chances to make it into the NFL.
Excellent findings. Once again Nebraska proves to be superior in football, god it feels good to be the chosen one's.
Post a Comment
<< Home